Twenty-six questions, four minutes. Six of them put real AI output in front of you and ask what is wrong with it, so you cannot talk your way up. You get a score from 1 to 10 and the one gap holding you there.
Average pay premium for roles requiring AI skills
PwC Global AI Jobs Barometer, 2026Growth in AI skill roles versus 9% for the wider job market
PwC Global AI Jobs Barometer, 2026Scored on accuracy, not on what you say about yourself
Most people overestimate by two levelsThis changes what we measure you against and what your roadmap prioritises.
Every question, scenario and roadmap step is written for the job you actually do.
One is barely touching AI. Ten is setting the standard for a whole function. There is no wrong answer here, but we will show you how close you were, and most people are not close.
Answer honestly. There is no passing score. Twenty-six questions, about four minutes. Six are scored on accuracy.
See how you compare against people you actually know. Most people find out they were not where they thought.
The projects that move you up each level, what each one proves, and roughly how long it takes.
Roles requiring AI skills carry a 62% average wage premium (PwC Global AI Jobs Barometer, 2026). That is a market figure across job postings, not a promise about any individual outcome.
Send them the test. It takes four minutes and most people find out they were not where they thought.
You can do all of this on your own. Most people do not, because the hard part is not knowing the steps — it is having something check whether you actually did them.
Then €39/month. First cohort locked at €29 for life. Cancel any time.
An average hides the problem. What matters is how many people sit below the line where AI starts carrying real work.
The full organisation report compares your distribution against the sector median, breaks it down by team, and shows which capability gaps cost the most to leave open.
Request the full reportEach level is something you prove, not something you watch.